世界中の科学者、気候変動危機など存在しない宣言

先日、世界中の科学者が「気候変動緊急事態を否定する宣言」の事について、一寸だけ書いたので、もう少し追記。

◆気候変動緊急事態など存在しない(There is no Climate Emergency)宣言書に、世界中の数多の科学者達が署名したという事実

宣言書の公開元:CLINTEL Web Site:CLINTELは気候変動及び気候政策の専門分野で活動する独立系財団である。

その科学者達は何を表明し、何を訴えているのか?

・気候科学は政治的であるべきではなく、気候政策はより一層科学的であるべきだ。特に科学者達はモデル造出が魔法の結果ではない事を重要視すべきだ:コンピュータモデルが人造であるように

・気候モデルの成果を信じるのはモデル立案者が突っ込む諸々(のデータやプログラム)を信ずる事であり、はっきり言って、気候モデルが中核をなす現在の気候変動議論が問題である。

★より詳しく

 1.気候変動危機など無い
 2.人為的要因だけでなく自然も温暖化の原因
 3.温暖化は予測されているよりも超ゆっくり
 4.気候政策は不適当なモデルに依存
 5.二酸化炭素は植物の食料であり、地球上の全ての命の基盤である
 6.地球温暖化は自然災害を増加させていない
 7.気候政策は科学的、経済的な現実を尊重すべきである

★CO2推し

 1.気候モデルは二酸化炭素の様な温室効果ガスの効果を台無しにする
 2.気候モデルは二酸化炭素で大気を肥やす事が有益であるという事実を無視する
 3.二酸化炭素は汚染物質ではなく、地球の全ての生き物にとって必要不可欠である
 4.光合成は恵みであり、世界中の農作物の収穫量を増加させる
 5.二酸化炭素削減策は費用が高くつくだけでなく、損害を与えるという十分な根拠が有る


◆気候変動緊急事態は無い

 1.パニックと警告は無用
 2.2050年までに提案されている有害で非現実的な二酸化炭素ネットゼロ政策に断固反対する


参照サイト&公開用説明文:

Web Site : No Climate Emergency(https://clintel.org/)

Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL) is an independent foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy.

Web Page : WORLD CLIMATE DECLARATION(https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/)

Pdf Page : World Climate Declaration plus all signatories in pdf(https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/WCD-version-111523.pdf)

Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today's climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models. In the future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.

There is no climate emergency

A global network of over 1800 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

The geological archive reveals that Earth's climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

Warming is far slower than predicted

The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

Climate policy relies on inadequate models

Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

Global warming has not increased natural disasters

There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be "prosperity for all" by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment.

Epilogue

The World Climate Declaration (WCD) has brought a large variety of competent scientists together from all over the world*. The considerable knowledge and experience of this group is indispensable in reaching a balanced, dispassionate and competent view of climate change.

From now onward the group is going to function as "Global Climate Intelligence Group". The CLINTEL Group will give solicited and unsolicited advice on climate change and energy transition to governments and companies worldwide.

* It is not the number of experts but the quality of arguments that counts

World Climate Declaration AMBASSADORS

NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR JOHN F. CLAUSER / USA
NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR IVAR GIAEVER NORWAY/USA
PROFESSOR GUUS BERKHOUT / THE NETHERLANDS
DR. CORNELIS LE PAIR / THE NETHERLANDS
PROFESSOR REYNALD DU BERGER / FRENCH SPEAKING CANADA
BARRY BRILL / NEW ZEALAND
VIV FORBES / AUSTRALIA
DR. PATRICK MOORE / ENGLISH SPEAKING CANADA
JENS MORTON HANSEN / DENMARK
PROFESSOR LASZIO SZARKA / HUNGARY
PROFESSOR SEOK SOON PARK / SOUTH KOREA
PROFESSOR JAN-ERIK SOLHEIM / NORWAY
STAVROS ALEXANDRIS / GREECE
FERDINAND MEEUS / DUTCH SPEAKING BELGIUM
PROFESSOR RICHARD LINDZEN / USA
HENRI A. MASSON / FRENCH SPEAKING BELGIUM
PROFESSOR INGEMAR NORDIN / SWEDEN
JIM O'BRIEN / REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
PROFESSOR IAN PLIMER / AUSTRALIA
DOUGLAS POLLOCK / CHILE
DR. BLANCA PARGA LANDA / SPAIN
PROFESSOR ALBERTO PRESTININZI / ITALY
PROFESSOR BENOIT RITTAUD / FRANCE
DR. THIAGO MAIA / BRAZIL
PROFESSOR FRITZ VAHRENHOLT / GERMANY
THE VISCOUNT MONCKTON OF BRENCHLEY / UNITED KINGDOM
DUSAN BIZIC / CROATIA, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, SERBIA AND MONTE NEGRO

2023 Clintel.org | All Rights Reserved | Climategate | RES in Beeld | by: Ber|Art and Clintel

この記事について

このページは、烏柄杓が2024年1月 4日 18:44に書いた記事です。

ひとつ前の記事は「捏造ニュースのNHKが生成AIのフェイクに騙されるなだって、COVID19ワクチンや温暖化人為説で大嘘を付いてきた癖に!!」です。

次の記事は「地球環境の為に、子供達の未来の為に脱炭素化?? 質の悪い陰謀論若しくは正気の沙汰とは思えない」です。

最近のコンテンツはインデックスページで見られます。過去に書かれたものはアーカイブのページで見られます。

ウェブページ

お気に入りリンク

Powered by Movable Type 6.3.2