国連機関の一部である「世界保健機関（ＷＨＯ）」が、幼児にまで性教育を実施するガイドラインを発表した。
「変態性欲集団＝ＬＧＢＴＱ＝ＷＨＯ＝悪魔の巣窟」最早隠し切れずに牙を剥き出しにしてしまった感じではある。
★日本は本当に国連中心主義、国連と共に歩んで行く、で良いのか？ 緊急制動（ブレーキ）すべきではないのか。
国連は、同意に基づく性交及び性行為は、どんな場合でも犯罪化されるべきではない！と言い放っている。
特に米国民主党は、保守派などでは当然無く、リベラル派などは名ばかり、急進左派に乗っ取られている様だが、本質はサタン派だ！！
そんな米国民主党の軛に争おうともせず、下男下女の如き自民党政権で、日本人は本当にそれを良しとするのか？
★同性婚を容認するようなＬＧＢＴ法は、自然の摂理を蔑ろにする、悪魔に魂を売り渡す最悪の法だ。
The WHO guidance says that children aged four and under should be taught about 'enjoyment and pleasure when touching one's own body, early childhood masturbation'
英国テレグラフの記事見出しは、
Outrage over WHO advice on sexuality for infants
Guide argues that 'sexuality education starts from birth'
幼児の性的興味（性別）に対するＷＨＯ勧告に激怒 － ガイドは性的興味への教育は誕生時から始まると主張する
◆当然、物議を醸し、反発を招いている。
子を持つ親は、世界に君臨しようとしている馬鹿共の企みを悟らなければならない。さもなくば「共通の理念や価値観」とか「民主主義」とか「平穏な暮らし」などは、支配者達に都合の良い「法の支配」によって、葬り去られてしまう事になる。
・４歳以下の子供達に対する性教育は必要か？
・４歳以下の子供達に性自認（性同一性）を探求させるべきか？
★噴飯物は何か
「自分の体に触れる時の楽しみや喜び、幼児期の自慰行為」について教えるべきだ。
「性的な事について質問する権利」と「性自認を追求する権利」がある事を教えるべきだ。
・これ等は年端も行かぬ子供達への教育と呼べるのだろうか？
Outrage over WHO advice on sexuality for infants
（https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/05/13/outrage-over-who-advice-on-sexuality-for-infants/）
Guide argues that 'sexuality education starts from birth'
The World Health Organisation (WHO) is under pressure to withdraw guidance for schools recommending that toddlers "ask questions about sexuality" and "explore gender identities".
The guidance says that "sexuality education starts from birth" and is described as a "framework for policy makers, educational and health authorities and specialists".
Its advice on how to "talk about sexual matters" with young children was aimed at policymakers across Europe, and was translated into several European languages and promoted at national and international events, according to the WHO.
The document was also cited in a report consulted by Welsh ministers who last year rolled out a mandatory sexual education syllabus to schools in Wales, and has led to a backlash from the Government, MPs and activists.
The advice proposes that four-to-six year olds should be taught to "talk about sexual matters" and "consolidate their gender identity".
It recommends that children under the age of four should be told they have "the right to ask questions about sexuality" and "the right to explore gender identities".
The WHO guidance also says that children aged four and under should be taught about "enjoyment and pleasure when touching one's own body, early childhood masturbation".
These topics are described as the "minimal standards that need to be covered by sexuality education".
A government spokesperson said: "The UK Government does not recognise this WHO guidance and we don't agree with its recommendations. We have not distributed or promoted it to schools.
"We offer our own guidance to help schools to teach children and young people about relationships and health."
However, the WHO guidance, first published in 2010, was cited in a 2017 report commissioned by Welsh ministers entitled "Informing the Future of the Sex and Relationships Curriculum in Wales".
Legally enforceable in Wales
The report was commissioned to "inform the development of the future Sex and Relationships (SRE) curriculum", which became legally enforceable in Welsh schools last year, although it did not adopt all of the recommendations in the report conducted by Cardiff University.
Laura Anne Jones MS, shadow minister for education in Wales, said the WHO "needs to rescind the advice immediately".
Ms Jones also called for the Welsh government to "distance themselves" from the "frankly disturbing" WHO guidance.
She added: "We must stop this pushing of harmful gender ideology into sex education in Wales and the UK, with immediate effect. The WHO needs to rescind the advice immediately."
A Welsh government spokesperson said it did not "endorse" the WHO guidance, adding: "What is taught in schools is set out clearly in the RSE Code. The code gives very clear direction to schools so that children only learn about things that are appropriate for their age and development.
"At a younger age children will be taught about treating each other with kindness and empathy."
'Premature sexualisation'
However, the laws have been condemned by MPs, parents' organisations and activist groups concerned about the premature sexualisation of children in Welsh schools.
Tanya Carter, a spokeswoman for Safe Schools Alliance, who campaign for child safety, has demanded an "urgent enquiry" into whether there is a link between "RSE curriculum in this country" and sexual education guidance issued by UN organisations such as the WHO and UNESCO.
"An urgent inquiry is needed into how this ideology... has come to influence so much public thinking," Ms Carter added.
A WHO spokesman told The Telegraph the organisation stands by its guidance and it remains accessible.
The spokesman added: "Our guidelines reflect established psychological facts about children's understanding of their bodies and psychosocial development based on decades of research."
The document asserts that children embark on sexual education from birth.
It reads: "From birth, babies learn the value and pleasure of bodily contact, warmth and intimacy. Soon after that, they learn what is 'clean' and what is 'dirty'."
It then goes on to conclude: "In other words, they are engaging in sexuality education."
'The WHO should know better'
A spokeswoman from Safe Schools Alliance UK said this approach "re-conceptualises children's entire existence, and all their relationships, as somehow connected to their sexuality and sexual behaviours".
John Hayes, MP, said: "The WHO should know better than to toy with the sensitivities of children and the concerns of parents in this way.
"Childhood is a time of innocence; for imagining, fairy tales, and play and joy. A lot of these people have a very warped understanding of the character of childhood and it's actually much simpler than they claim in their guidance."
The WHO document presents three models of sexual education - "Types" one, two and three - which range from an "abstinence-only" approach to encouraging children to pursue "sexual growth and development".
It advocates the most liberal approach, which it refers to as "Type 3" or "holistic sexuality education," as a source of "unbiased" and "scientifically correct" information on "all aspects of sexuality".
However, it depicts the most conservative model, which it refers to as an "abstinence-only" approach, as having been proven to have "no positive effects on sexual behaviour" or the "risk of teenage pregnancy".
